GQ’s power ranking of the prime candidates to be the next James Bond is updated regularly—and will be until an official announcement is made. Four years on from the conclusion of Daniel Craig’s acclaimed stint as 007, and we’re still yet to find his successor. The question remains: who will be the next James Bond? Seems like we’re closer than ever to finding out. In a recent interview with Deadline, Bond mega-producer Amy Pascal — who has just scored in a major way via Spider-Man: Brand New Day, having also handled Spidey since Tom Holland’s solo debut Spider-Man: Homecoming — dropped a big hint as to the 007 casting timeline.
“I would say the end of the year is a good bet,” she said, meaning it’s likely a matter of months before the next Bond actor is officially tuxed up. “We are being really, really methodical… I mean, Daniel Craig is a hard act to follow. And it’s got to be something [that is] stirring, and exciting, and different.”
This update follows a June report, also from Deadline, that the Bond audition process had been whittled down to its final shortlist, with director Denis Villeneuve getting on the phone with some of the leading names.
Said names remain shrouded in mystery, but Deadline’s sources had told them that auditions will commence in August; though an exact number of actors in the running is unknown, they report that it could be anywhere from “five to seven” names to a figure “in the teens.”
If you’re really up for some speculation, Page Six apparently has sources who claim screen tests are due to start early next month, with a shortlist including obvious A-list candidates (Callum Turner, Jacob Elordi), not so obvious ones (Paul Mescal?), and an unknown wild card in the form of Jack Barton.
Take all that with a tablespoon of salt—but
Take all that with a tablespoon of salt—but what we know for a fact is that the audition process is underway, with the studio confirming as much in a statement in May. It has long been thought that Amazon would want their Bond confirmed by the end of the year, allowing for production to kick off in 2027. Historically, the rumor mill has kicked around names as varied as Idris Elba, James Norton, Theo James, and Aaron Taylor-Johnson.
Elba was long thought to be the frontrunner; Taylor-Johnson once seemed like a dead cert. But the last year has perhaps been the most seismic yet for the future of 007. Amazon bought creative control from long-time Bond custodians Barbara Broccoli and Michael G Wilson—the daughter and stepson of franchise originator Albert “Cubby” Broccoli. The super-producer duo of David Heyman (Harry Potter) and Pascal stepped in to take the reins.
Denis Villeneuve was hired to direct Bond 26; Peaky Blinders creator Steven Knight is writing the script. With so many of the essential pieces in place for the next Bond movie, we now circle back to the small question of who will play 007 himself. As it stands, all bets are on Callum Turner, who has been the favorite for the last six months, but other big names have also done the rounds.
There’s Harris Dickinson, who is soon to play
There’s Harris Dickinson, who is soon to play John Lennon in Sam Mendes’ Beatles films; Australian it-guy Jacob Elordi, who bagged his first Oscar nomination for last year’s Frankenstein and stole hearts as Heathcliff in February’s Wuthering Heights; and even Spider-Man himself, Tom Holland, has been reported to be in the running. Basically, we’re still somewhat in the dark. Turner, who recently married Dua Lipa in a high-profile Sicily wedding—hardly the worst press attention to be courting right now—downplayed his Bond links in a June interview with The Hollywood Reporter, declining to comment on whether he’d even want the job.
“I know as much as you do—really, I know as much as you do,” he told the journalist who so valiantly tried for what would’ve been the culture scoop of the year. “I’ll tell you what’s so funny about the Bond thing: Even your best friends ask you, people text you that you haven’t spoken to for 10 years—and you know nothing!” Either he’s genuinely as clueless as the rest of us, or that MI6 training is already coming in handy.
Nevertheless, with casting officially underway, celebratory martinis shall soon be in order. In the meantime, this is our ranking of the likeliest candidates to be the next Bond. Top Agents
1. Callum Turner
The Masters of the Air and Fantastic Beasts actor has it all: charm, charisma, good looks. And his fiancée Dua Lipa could make for a decent Bond girl…
Why: For starters, Turner is exactly famous enough to play Bond: he’s fairly well known among people who follow film and TV, and your dad might recognize him off Masters of the Air, but he isn’t so A-list that his casting would risk overshadowing the role.
That’s without accounting for his obvious Dua Lipa-courting
That’s without accounting for his obvious Dua Lipa-courting charm, charisma up the wazoo, and eyes that you could drown in—all traits that would help him settle into playing the world’s best superspy. What’s more? He’s actually a good actor, as demonstrated in the aforementioned Masters, in which he plays a World War II pilot whose heavy bomber unit boasts one of the highest mortality rates in the entire U.S.
Air Force. Turner was recently described as the new frontrunner by much of the British press, after his odds were slashed by the vast majority of bookmakers. In the wake of the betting markets coming to bat for the actor, The Telegraph wrote a long piece speculating why he could be the right man for the job; his newfound status as Bond favorite also drew attention from the NME, Complex, and other major culture outlets.
Many also pointed to the fact that he holidayed in Oracabessa Bay this summer—home of the estate, also known as “GoldenEye,” where Bond author Ian Fleming wrote many of his Bond novels. Why not: There aren’t a lot of arguments against Turner, especially if the initial reports that Amazon are looking for someone under 30 prove inaccurate. He’s 35, which would traditionally put him in the right age bracket for Bond; he’s good-looking, a talented actor, British.
He has most of the desirable traits
He has most of the desirable traits. Perhaps, clocking in at around six-foot-two, he’s a little bit tall? But eh, we’re probably due a double-O giraffe. What are the odds? Kalshi currently has Turner at a 28% chance of booking the role, which means he’s now just a percentage point shy of leading the pack…
2. Jack Lowden
A Scotsman playing a spy, you say? Why: It’s almost too obvious to be worth saying, but we’ll say it anyway—he’s played a spy.
Helpfully for his case, he’s also managed to play a spy very well across four seasons and counting of Slow Horses, Apple TV’s MI5-based thriller. He’s got that sort of pragmatic clever guy thing going on, where you can tell he’s smart but in a way that you still feel like you understand, and it’s easy to imagine him having the smirking wit required of a Bond. Why not: See the first sentence of the paragraph above.
Actually, see the second sentence too. It might just all be a little too on the nose. Watch him playing Bond and don’t think of him as that other spy he played—it seems a lot to ask of an audience. Then again, he plays that other spy so well. And Roger Moore had also played a spy before he was Bond, it’s worth noting. What are the odds? After a BBC presenter mentioned him as a rumored Bond front-runner this month, precipitating a spike in Bond-related buzz around his name, Lowden has leapfrogged reigning contender Callum Turner on the Kalshi ranking, and is currently at 29%.
3. Jack Barton Another unknown enters the ring—and
3. Jack Barton
Another unknown enters the ring—and is rumored to have his nose out in front. Why: According to Page Six, this little-known actor is the frontrunner. If that’s true, becoming Bond would be a quantum leap above his roles thus far, which include playing an unnamed “Fop” in Poor Things, David Nelson in Heartstopper, and real-life SAS officer John Tonkin in the second series of SAS: Rogue Heroes.
His age (31) and lack of profile do track with reports that producers want a young-ish unknown to take the role. That SAS experience also feels quite old-school Bond, which might be an asset if the film ends up as an actual period piece, or at least channels a trad sensibility to differentiate it from the Craig era. Why not: As useful as it might be to have an unknown for Denis and co to mold as they fit, Barton hasn’t had a leading or semi-leading role yet, even in something small, to prove he can carry a film.
Also—no one goes to Page Six for rigorously double-azenby was Australian, too. Why: Jacob Elordi is hot right now. He’s been hot this whole time, but in terms of cultural capital, he’s basically on fire. Long gone are the days of him being shackled to The Kissing Booth movies, and with Euphoria on its way out, there’s no long-term commitments standing between the Frankenstein Oscar nominee and the Bond role
He’s a director’s actor who knows how
He’s a director’s actor who knows how to wear a suit (and a tiny little handbag); it’s kind of a no-brainer. Why not: He may now be too famous for the part, if Villeneuve is really looking for an unknown to shape the role around; however, if Amazon wants a name who’ll bring in a younger audience, Elordi probably has a slight edge over Turner. Elordi, who turns 29 in June, would be the youngest Bond ever, and—at 6′ 5″—also the tallest, a fact that has outraged a subset of Bond fans who demand absolute realism from a franchise that has featured an invisible car and James Bond having sex in zero G.
What are the odds? Elordi is still trailing Turner at this writing, with a 19% chance per Kalshi, but if the buzz continues to build, we could be looking at a self-fulfilling prophecy. 5. Harris Dickinson
The Kingsman and Babygirl star boasts all of the suave sophistication one might wish for from a potential Bond. Why: A shape-shifter of a performer, Harris Dickinson has done it all by his mid-twenties: he’s led a major franchise installment in The Kingsman, and won over cinephile hearts and minds in esoteric, artsier fare like Beach Rats, Matthias & Maxime and The Souvenir Part II.
The Kingsman especially proved his spy bona fides, along with atypical emotional versatility and all of the screen presence you’d demand of Bond. His take? “Nah, I don’t think so,” he told ES Magazine. Humble, too! Why not: He’s only 28, which would historically make him a touch too young to play the grizzled super spy, though Amazon seem to feel differently. What are the odds?
Dickinson’s odds have dipped since he joined
Dickinson’s odds have dipped since he joined the cast of Sam Mendes’ four Beatles movies as John Lennon, which will no doubt keep him busy for a good couple of years. 6. Aaron Taylor-Johnson
Already known for playing kick-ass superheroes, Bond wouldn’t be a huge leap. Why: Taylor-Johnson has it all. The actor, no stranger to stunts, has proven himself as an action star across the arc of his career, in the Kick-Ass movies, Avengers: Age of Ultron, Godzilla, Tenet, Bullet Train, and 2024’s Kraven the Hunter.
On top of this, he has great emotional range, as showcased by his breakthrough role as a young John Lennon in Nowhere Boy. He has been subject to Bond speculation for years, at the center of tabloid rumors and online fan castings. A report in The Sun last year detailed how he had been “formally offered” the role by ex-producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson, but that has yet to turn into an official announcement.
The bookies’ odds had shifted away from him up until last year, when he was announced as watchmaker Omega’s latest global ambassador. Omega has been associated with Bond since the era of Pierce Brosnan, who wore a Seamaster in 1995’s GoldenEye. Perhaps it is just a coincidence that the frequent Bond favorite partnered up with Bond’s favorite horologists, but maybe it isn’t. Why not?
With Amazon and Villeneuve reportedly looking at actors
With Amazon and Villeneuve reportedly looking at actors under 30, ATJ could now be a little old for the part. What are the odds? ATJ has slipped to third place behind Turner and Dickinson per the bookies. 7. Henry Cavill
Look, Cavill needs a new franchise to jump into and we’re ready to accept him with open arms. Why: Draw a picture of Bond, and the result would be Henry Cavill.
Square-jawed, broad-shouldered, dark-haired, blue-eyed. Classically handsome, but could clearly take you in a fight. Auditioning for the role, aged 22, in 2005, Cavill reached the final two before Craig edged him out (apparently it was a virtual toss-up). Sixteen years later, matured as an actor and a man, surely he could go one better? He’s got the gap in his schedule, at least.
After the absolute mess of his Superman reintroduction and subsequent axing, there’s a big franchise-shaped hole in Cavill’s life waiting to be filled. “He looked great in the audition. His acting was tremendous,” Casino Royale director Director Martin Campbell told the Express . “And look, if Daniel didn’t exist, Henry would have made an excellent Bond. He looked terrific, he was in great physical shape… very handsome, very chiselled
He just looked a little young
He just looked a little young at that time back then.” Cavill would’ve been in his very early twenties at the time of his tryout, so yeah, a little young indeed. Cavill has just had a big boost apropos of Jeff Bezos’s casting call-out. Look at the replies to that post — it’s pretty much all Cavill. Will Amazon give the X users what they want? Why not: Perhaps his history with franchises is his greatest disadvantage.
Cavill cuts a dashing figure but nobody can be Superman, The Witcher’s Geralt, and James Bond. Granted, his stints in both of those properties have now ended, but they’ll likely follow him for years to come. Likewise, Cavill’s stint as Napoleon Solo in The Man from U.N.C.L.E is probably too close to Bond (ditch Solo’s American accent and it’s the same character); he’s also starred in Bond send-up Argyle as a steely British superspy.
Bond may have missed out on him. What are the odds? Cavill’s odds peaked in early 2025 and these days he’s hovering just below 10% per Kalshi; he’s got a strong rooting section but seems unlikely to bring this one home. 8. Josh O’Connor
Give the true Flemingheads the nontraditional Bond they want. Why: This is how Ian Fleming describes James Bond in the books: Six foot, blue-grey eyes, short black hair, slim build, and a “cruel” mouth.
Doesn’t that sound like Josh O’Connor to you
Doesn’t that sound like Josh O’Connor to you? Even down to the mouth? He’s also 34, which means he’s ideal for the role if the producers are open to a thirtysomething 007. He’s been enjoying a real surge of popularity in the moviesphere of late, from his leading turns in Luca Guadagnino’s Challengers and Alice Rohrwacher’s La Chimera to last year’s Wake Up Dead Man and The Mastermind.
Why not: O’Connor is yet to have that bonafide Bond audition role that eventual Bond actors have traditionally enjoyed pre-casting—Craig had Layer Cake, Moore had The Saint. The softly-spoken British actor appears more enamored with gritty, complicated, slightly left-field roles about being a washed-up tennis champ, a Yorkshire sheep farmer or a criminal archaeologist. O’Connor himself also doesn’t seem particularly sold on the idea, either.
In an interview on IGV Presents during Challengers promo, a journalist told him that he could see him as Bond. “Could you?!” O’Connor responded, looking a little incredulous and unconvinced, before laughing off the idea. “I’m not sure I could!” That said, he’s got a major role on deck in Steven Spielberg’s mysterious UFO thriller Disclosure Day, which hits theaters in June; he may not be able to cruise beneath the radar for much longer.
What are the odds? At one point,
What are the odds? At one point, the Irish oddsmaker Paddy Power had O’Connor as a 2/1 favorite, but those odds have since dropped sharply, and he’s now 33/1 at most major bookies— which puts him in line with Robert Pattinson, another unlikely choice. 9. Tom Holland
Can one actor play both Bond and Spider-Man? Why not? Why: He wants it, for a start. While lots of actors play coy when it comes to openly admitting they would leap at the chance to don the tux and pick up the Walther PPK, Tom Holland appeared on Variety’s Awards Circuit podcast some years ago and confirmed that he was very keen on taking on Bond.
“Ultimately,” said Holland, “as a young British lad who loves cinema, I’d love to be James Bond. I’m just putting that out there. I look pretty good in a suit.” He even pitched a Bond origin story film to Sony, which didn’t work out—but led to him getting the gig as the lead of Uncharted. Casting Holland would be a coup for Amazon on virtually every commercial front.
He is one of the most popular and beloved idols on the planet, a personable and stylish young actor with a built-in legion of fans who already know him from playing Spider-Man in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Adding Bond to his resumé would mean Holland was playing a central role in two of the planet’s biggest franchises. And the fact that Spider-Man producer Amy Pascal is now one of the producers dictating the future of Bond has got to represent a boost for Holland’s Bond chances: they’ve worked together for years, and vanishingly few others are more aware of how bankable the actor can be.
Why not: There are very few arguments against
Why not: There are very few arguments against him, but the main sticking point has to be his youth: Holland is in his late twenties and still plays lots of characters who are teenagers. Bond is typically a veteran with years of experience under his belt and Holland might be better off waiting to become the next-but-one (or even two) Bond. The other issue? He’s about to add another blockbuster to his belt in the form of Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey.
Between that his obligations for Spider-Man 4 and the upcoming Avengers movies, it’s hard to see when he’d ever have the time to shoot a Bond film. Let alone Bond film(s). What are the odds? Holland has dropped out of the main crop at 20/1. 10. Theo James
He’s like if you could make James Bond in The Sims. Why: Theo James’s lead role in Guy Ritchie’s The Gentlemen, the 2019 film’s universe-expanding series on Netflix, is basically an eight-episode audition for Bond.
In it, he plays a charming aristocrat with a secret set of army skills, clobbering bad guys and racing off in a getaway car, without breaking much of a sweat. Not for nothing: He also looks like if you could make a generic idea of James Bond on the Sims. He’s fronted action franchises and played romantic leads. But crucially he’s never been pigeon-holed by any one character from his roster, and that’s good if you’re going to sign on to the most defining role of all time.
Why not: Well, he just doesn’t seem
Why not: Well, he just doesn’t seem that keen on it. Of course, this may be classic actor humility — an ‘aww shucks’ attempt at being flattered by the conversation. But speaking to SiriusXM in 2023, James said: “I love some of the Sean Connery movies, but I think they need to do something else. Do you know what I mean? They need to really go with a reinvention of it in a different way and that wouldn’t be me.” That was a few years ago now, though.
Perhaps Amazon can twist his arm. What are the odds? James hovers around 6 to 10/1 depending on who you ask, though Betfair have him as a real outsider at 26/1. 11. Jonathan Bailey
The more we think about it, the more we reckon the Bridgerton and Wicked heartthrob should be considered among the top picks for the next Bond. Why: Let’s start with the basic point: just look at him.
There’s charm and charisma radiating off Bailey that’d be the envy of any super-suave super spy, let alone Bond himself. He is one of the world’s foremost heartthrobs, and has been since he was in Bridgerton—and his time as Fiyero in Wicked has only reinforced his reputation as one of the sexiest men alive. Look, we don’t want to excessively objectify anyone in the year of our lord 2025, but if you believe debonair allure should be the deciding factor in casting the next James Bond, you have to think of Bailey as a leading candidate.
He proved his blockbuster bonafides last summer
And he proved his blockbuster bonafides last summer with a top-of-the-bill part in Jurassic World Rebirth. Truth be told, there are few out there who are more qualified on paper. Why not: At 37, he might be a touch too old. The demands of Jurassic World might also work against him, should they make more sequels starring Bailey after Rebirth. But otherwise, he just seems like an excellent pick.
What are the odds? Bailey has had something of a Wicked charged surge with the bookmakers, with his odds peaking at around 7/1. He has since slipped down to 14/1. 12. James Norton
The star of House of Guinness and House of the Dragon. Why: James Norton’s profile rocketed in 2016 with his triple whammy performances in Happy Valley (profound psycho), War and Peace (mournful warrior) and Grantchester (Anglican priest with a robust moral compass).
With an eclectic mix of characters already on his CV, as well as an education at Cambridge, we’re certain that Norton could easily slip into the role of the suave and sophisticated 007, especially if his upcoming turn on HBO’s House of the Dragon boosts his recognition. The late Hollywood veteran Diane Keaton told Sky News in 2017 that Norton would be perfect for the 007 role: “He’s got everything that you need.
First of all he’s extremely attractive, very smart,
First of all he’s extremely attractive, very smart, he’s well educated, and he’s a fantastic actor. And he’s sexy, right? I’m not wrong, I mean, women are gonna love him.” And at the young age of 39, he could definitely carry the Bond franchise for many years to come. Why Not: One issue with Norton is his ability to attract a large enough audience to back him. The transition from beloved TV actor to the face of the world’s biggest action franchise could prove to be too big of an ask, and Norton is yet to prove that he’s true blockbuster material.
But then again, did that prevent the Bond producers from hiring Pierce Brosnan (best known when he made GoldenEye for the TV series Remington Steele) or indeed Craig (whose credits were largely in independent films like Layer Cake)? What are the odds? Norton is around 20/1 at most bookies. 13. Regé-Jean Page
Page proved what he could do with a spoon. Let’s see what happens when we give him a gun.
Why: If Bond is the most eligible bachelor ever to appear on screen (let’s be clear: he is), then there are few better auditions than Regé-Jean Page’s turn as Simon Basset, the Duke Of Hastings, in Shonda Rhimes’ adaptation of the Bridgerton novels. Although he left the series after just one season, the show is proof that he’d ace the Bond tuxedo test and he has the necessary charm and lightness of touch to deliver Bond’s one-liners.
He’s gone on to play romantic leads
He’s gone on to play romantic leads in films like this year’s You, Me, and Tuscany—and, not for nothing, he’s played a British intelligence officer once before, in Steven Soderbergh’s Black Bag. Why not: He’d make for a convincingly debonair Bond, for sure—but could Page deliver the right sort of deep, brooding menace to Bond that audiences accustomed to the Craig version have come to expect?
There’s an argument that he’s a little lightweight. What are the odds? Once a leading candidate, Page’s odds have since extended to around 40/1. 14. Paul Mescal
The primo softboi is entering his hardboi era. Why: It’s been a banner few years for Paul Mescal. After erupting into our lives during the pandemic as some kind of parasocial soft boi in Normal People, he nabbed his first Oscar nomination for the intimate and brooding Aftersun; more recently, he demonstrated the ability to hold his own in an action blockbuster by stepping into Russell Crowe’s shoes in Ridley Scott’s Gladiator II.
Could he be the first 007 to rock a signature gold chain? Why not: Mescal may have entered his tough-guy era for Ridley Scott, but there’s just something inherently unthreatening about him—a sensitivity that’s ideal for a lot of parts, but not necessarily a plus when you’re casting a guy with a license to kill. What are the odds? He’s a real outside shout, especially now that he’s set to play Paul McCartney in the Sam Mendes Beatles films.
You can’t be doing that and Bond, can
You can’t be doing that and Bond, can you? His odds, as high as 50/1 at William Hill, generally reflect that. 15. Patrick Gibson
The Dublin-born actor is best known for playing a young Dexter Morgan in Dexter: Original Sin, and it’s rumoured that he’ll play Bond in the upcoming video game 007 First Light. Why: Dexter: Original Sin actor Patrick Gibson has already been cast as the next James Bond—in the upcoming video game 007 First Light, which drops May 27.
It seems unlikely that the Bond producers would lead with a game to announce the new Bond actor, but he’d also be a solid pick for the live-action license to kill. He looks the part, is just about the right age at 30, and has a decent fandom behind him apropos of Dexter. Why not: From what we’ve read about 007 First Light, it looks as though the game’s producers want to delineate the Bond game world from the new Bond film universe—First Light is set to tell an all-new origin 007 origin story and features him as a much younger man.
Would the upcoming films really relegate such important character-building to a video game? They’re almost certainly going to be treated as separate worlds, but let’s see. 16. Scott Rose-Marsh
The first time we heard of this relatively unknown TV actor was when he was linked to Bond — but it wouldn’t be the first time that a new star has been plucked from obscurity to become 007.
Why: Scott Rose-Marsh doesn’t have a lot
Why: Scott Rose-Marsh doesn’t have a lot of screen credits; truth be told, the first time we’d heard of him is when a recent The Hollywood Reporter article put it that he screen-tested for Bond back in late June. But if their sources are correct, that does mean that the little-known Brit is one of the only actors with a concrete link to the role. While there has been plenty of speculation around, say, Harris Dickinson and Aaron Taylor-Johnson, this is the first time we’re hearing about an actual audition.
That in itself must put Rose-Marsh somewhere towards the top of the pack. At the very least, it’s a great bit of publicity for him, so kudos to his management if it is a big PR ploy. Why not: George Lazenby might have only acted in commercials before he took on Bond in On Her Majesty’s Secret Service, but it seems unlikely that Amazon would put all of the weight of their billion-dollar crown jewel on the shoulders of a TV actor who hasn’t had a credited role since 2023 (per IMDB).
That and he’s a redhead. Craig’s blond locks caused enough of a conniption—Amazon may want to steer clear of the controversy a ginger 007 would engender. 17. Pierce Brosnan
With Amazon taking full creative control of the Bond franchise, is the door now open to #BrosBack? Why: We’ve been pushing this for a while, but hear us out. A one-and-done spin-off starring every Millennial’s favorite Bond in his golden years could be a banger, and if done well, it would be more than mere fan service.
Amazon would do well to look to Logan,
Amazon would do well to look to Logan, Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine swansong (until he joined the MCU, at least) for an idea of how to nail Old Bond: capture 007 a decade after his retirement, languishing in the guilt and regret that he built up over years of espionage and state-sanctioned assassinations. After all, Sean Bean’s Trevelyan called it in GoldenEye: “I might as well ask you for the vodka martinis that have silenced the screams of all the men you’ve killed,” he said.
“Or if you find forgiveness in the arms of all those willing women, for the dead ones you failed to protect.” A film revisiting those themes later down the line would be ripe for drama. Besides which, Brosnan was regularly let down by his movies. Isn’t he owed a last crack at the whip? Why not: The idea of a Bond returning after his hiatus isn’t entirely unprecedented—Sean Connery skipped On Her Majesty’s Secret Service, only to come back for Diamonds Are Forever.
But after 25-odd years? It only seems more implausible when you factor in for Brosnan’s age. It would certainly have to be for a Lazenby style one-off, which leaves one to wonder whether it would be more likely pitched as a lower-budget TV show in today’s streaming age (think: Disney+’s Star Wars spin-off Obi-Wan Kenobi), and nobody would win with that. As Brosnan has shared his view on the subject, perhaps it is best we let sleeping dogs lie.
Source: www.gq.com
